There are no upcoming MOQBA events announced at this time. Check back later for an updated calendar.
Questions used in high quality quizbowl formats contain multiple clues, beginning with the more obscure clues and containing several progressively easier, yet unambiguous, clues about the same answer, and ending with the most well-known clues. By arranging clues this way, more knowledgable teams have a better chance of answering a question on a more obscure clue before an easier clue that both teams know is read, while the inclusion of well-known facts at the end of the question keep it accessible to a wide variety of teams.
The advantages of pyramidal questions can be best demonstrated with a comparison of the two types of questions. Here is a typical question used in Missouri tournaments ("Tossup 1"):
The first substantial clue (Billy Pilgrim), combined with knowing that the answer is a novel, will immediately result in every player who is familiar with Billy Pilgrim trying to buzz in simultaneously, devolving the question into a buzzer race. Anybody who has studied a list of literary protagonists would have the same chance of answering the question as someone who has read Slaughterhouse-Five or someone who has studied Vonnegut's works.
The biggest flaw with this type of question is that it rewards the player who most quickly presses the buzzer, and not the player who knows more about the subject. The goal of quizbowl is to reward knowledge, but when short questions like this are used, it gives teams with better reflexes an unfair advantage. Additionally, while it is very difficult for a person to improve reflexes, a dedicated player has the potential to improve significantly when the game is based on knowledge and not speed.
Compare that question to this better-written pyramidal question ("Tossup 2"):
This question uses several clues ordered by decreasing difficulty to reward more knowledgable players. A player who has read Slaughterhouse-Five might be able to answer the question very early in the question due to his/her deep familiarity with the work. An experienced quiz bowl player who hasn't read it would have a better chance of knowing that Slaughterhouse-Five includes a depiction of the firebombing of Dresden, because it is a common clue in questions about the work. Finally, the question ends with a giveaway clue that makes it most accessible, so even a player with little literature knowledge might have a shot at it if nobody has answered the question by that point.
Note that the giveaway clue in Tossup 2 contains the entirety of Tossup 1; therefore, pyramidal questions are NOT more difficult than one-liners, because they contain accessible clues at the end. In reality, it is shorter questions that have greater potential to be more difficult. When questions are short, the only way to write different questions on the same topic is to use entirely different clues, and when there are only one or two well-known clues about a topic, a writer will use more obscure clues that are less accessible, resulting in more questions going unanswered.
Another benefit of the pyramidal style is that questions include a good amount of information that players may not know; consequently, not only do pyramidal questions fairly gauge a player's current knowledge, it also provides significant opportunities for players to learn something from the questions. A player who hears this Slaughterhouse-Five question might remember some of the plot details and be rewarded the next time a question with a similar clue appears, or might find one of the many clues interesting and decide to read the novel as a result.
There are several other stylistic benefits to players found in high quality questions:
To summarize, pyramidal questions help lead players to the correct answer by using a series of useful clues that fairly reward more knowledgeable teams, while providing opportunities for players to improve simply by playing more questions.
To fully understand the benefits of using pyramidal questions, it is important to understand what pyramidal questions are NOT: